Review




Structured Review

Addgene inc cdc20
Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to <t>CDC20</t> (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).
Cdc20, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdc20/product/Addgene inc
Average 92 stars, based on 5 article reviews
cdc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
92/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer"

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

Journal: Genes & Diseases

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).

Techniques Used: CRISPR, Expressing, Ubiquitin Proteomics

CDRs linked with neuroendocrine features in prostate cancer cohorts. (A) The Venn diagram illustrates the genes specifically enhanced in prostate cancer compared with normal prostate tissues and NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma. (B, C) The relative expression of CDRs in NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma in different prostate cancer cohorts. (D) Correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score. The red indicates the higher NE score. (E, F) Pearson correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score CRPC cohort. (G) The heatmap indicates the relative expression of CDRs and AR, as well as KLK3, a transcription activity indication of AR. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NEPC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer; NE, neuroendocrine; AR, androgen receptor; KLK3, kallikrein-related peptidase 3.
Figure Legend Snippet: CDRs linked with neuroendocrine features in prostate cancer cohorts. (A) The Venn diagram illustrates the genes specifically enhanced in prostate cancer compared with normal prostate tissues and NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma. (B, C) The relative expression of CDRs in NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma in different prostate cancer cohorts. (D) Correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score. The red indicates the higher NE score. (E, F) Pearson correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score CRPC cohort. (G) The heatmap indicates the relative expression of CDRs and AR, as well as KLK3, a transcription activity indication of AR. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NEPC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer; NE, neuroendocrine; AR, androgen receptor; KLK3, kallikrein-related peptidase 3.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Activity Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics

CDRs ablation suppressed prostate cancer cell proliferation. (A) The circuit diagram illustrates the correlation among CDRs co-expressed gene sets. (B) Venn analysis of the overlap of CDRs co-expressed genes. (C) The heatmap shows the relative expression of CDRs overlapped co-expressed genes in patients with NE signature high and low groups. (D – F) The heatmap illustrates the correlation of CDRs co-expressed genes with CDRs in ADPC (D) and CRPC (E, F) patient cohorts. (G, H) KEGG pathway analysis (G) and GSEA analysis (H) of enriched biological processes of CDRs and CDRs co-expressed genes. (I, J) The diagram illustrates the working model of CRISPR-Cas13 for RNA silencing and knockdown efficiency of CDRs with the corresponding gRNAs. (K, L) Cell growth assays indicate the impact of CDRs knockdown on the viability of different prostate cancer cells. (M) Western blotting analysis of the expression of cell cycle-regulated genes, including CCND1, CDK1, and p-CDK1, after CDRs knockdown. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NE, neuroendocrine; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; CCND1, cyclin D1; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.
Figure Legend Snippet: CDRs ablation suppressed prostate cancer cell proliferation. (A) The circuit diagram illustrates the correlation among CDRs co-expressed gene sets. (B) Venn analysis of the overlap of CDRs co-expressed genes. (C) The heatmap shows the relative expression of CDRs overlapped co-expressed genes in patients with NE signature high and low groups. (D – F) The heatmap illustrates the correlation of CDRs co-expressed genes with CDRs in ADPC (D) and CRPC (E, F) patient cohorts. (G, H) KEGG pathway analysis (G) and GSEA analysis (H) of enriched biological processes of CDRs and CDRs co-expressed genes. (I, J) The diagram illustrates the working model of CRISPR-Cas13 for RNA silencing and knockdown efficiency of CDRs with the corresponding gRNAs. (K, L) Cell growth assays indicate the impact of CDRs knockdown on the viability of different prostate cancer cells. (M) Western blotting analysis of the expression of cell cycle-regulated genes, including CCND1, CDK1, and p-CDK1, after CDRs knockdown. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NE, neuroendocrine; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; CCND1, cyclin D1; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.

Techniques Used: Expressing, CRISPR, Knockdown, Western Blot, Ubiquitin Proteomics

CDRs were transcriptionally regulated by the RB1/E2F1 axis in prostate cancer. (A) The diagrams show the canonical E2F1 motif location within the promoter of CDRs. (B) ChIP-sequencing E2F1 enrichment peak within the promoter of CDRs. (C) The relative enrichment of E2F1 within the promoter of CDRs was determined using standard ChIP-qPCR. (D) ChIP-sequencing peaks show the relative enrichment of E2F1 in CDRs' promoters after RB1 is known. (E – G) The relative expression of CDRs in CRPC patients with different RB1 deletion status. (H) CDRs expression in patients with RB1 deletion mutations from different prostate cancer cohorts. (I) qRT-PCR detected the relative expression of CDRs after RB1 or E2F1 knockdown with CRISPR-Cas13. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). RB1, retinoblastoma tumor suppressor 1; E2F1, early 2 factor 1; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.
Figure Legend Snippet: CDRs were transcriptionally regulated by the RB1/E2F1 axis in prostate cancer. (A) The diagrams show the canonical E2F1 motif location within the promoter of CDRs. (B) ChIP-sequencing E2F1 enrichment peak within the promoter of CDRs. (C) The relative enrichment of E2F1 within the promoter of CDRs was determined using standard ChIP-qPCR. (D) ChIP-sequencing peaks show the relative enrichment of E2F1 in CDRs' promoters after RB1 is known. (E – G) The relative expression of CDRs in CRPC patients with different RB1 deletion status. (H) CDRs expression in patients with RB1 deletion mutations from different prostate cancer cohorts. (I) qRT-PCR detected the relative expression of CDRs after RB1 or E2F1 knockdown with CRISPR-Cas13. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). RB1, retinoblastoma tumor suppressor 1; E2F1, early 2 factor 1; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

Techniques Used: ChIP-sequencing, ChIP-qPCR, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Knockdown, CRISPR, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Virtual screening identified compounds that suppressed advanced prostate cancer. (A) The diagram illustrates structure-based virtual screening strategies for CDRs-targeted compounds. (B) The heatmap shows the binding affinity of compounds with CDRs. The red indicated a higher binding affinity of compounds with the corresponding compounds. (C, D) Cell viability assays were used to determine the tumor suppressive effect of compounds with high CDRs-binding affinity in different prostate cancer cell models. (E – G) The 2D structure of Q199, XDD60, and A79, which exhibits the most significant anti-tumor efficacy in prostate cancer cell models. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).
Figure Legend Snippet: Virtual screening identified compounds that suppressed advanced prostate cancer. (A) The diagram illustrates structure-based virtual screening strategies for CDRs-targeted compounds. (B) The heatmap shows the binding affinity of compounds with CDRs. The red indicated a higher binding affinity of compounds with the corresponding compounds. (C, D) Cell viability assays were used to determine the tumor suppressive effect of compounds with high CDRs-binding affinity in different prostate cancer cell models. (E – G) The 2D structure of Q199, XDD60, and A79, which exhibits the most significant anti-tumor efficacy in prostate cancer cell models. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).

Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics

Compounds targeting CDRs exhibited superior anti-tumor efficacy compared with AR antagonists. (A – E) The tumor cell growth inhibition effects of different dosages of Q199, XDD60, and A79, as well as enzalutamide, were determined with CCK-8 assays (A–D), and the IC 50 of each agent was calculated with three independent experiments (E). (F, G) The histograms show the relative cell viability after being treated with 5 M of Q199, XDD60, or A79 alone, or a combination. (H) The Venn diagram shows the overlap of Q199, XDD60, and A79 potential targets predicted with SwissTargetPrediction ( http://swisstargetprediction.ch/ ). Molecular docking shows the binding of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. (I) The lowest binding (LB) affinity of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. ns, not significant. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). AR, androgen receptor.
Figure Legend Snippet: Compounds targeting CDRs exhibited superior anti-tumor efficacy compared with AR antagonists. (A – E) The tumor cell growth inhibition effects of different dosages of Q199, XDD60, and A79, as well as enzalutamide, were determined with CCK-8 assays (A–D), and the IC 50 of each agent was calculated with three independent experiments (E). (F, G) The histograms show the relative cell viability after being treated with 5 M of Q199, XDD60, or A79 alone, or a combination. (H) The Venn diagram shows the overlap of Q199, XDD60, and A79 potential targets predicted with SwissTargetPrediction ( http://swisstargetprediction.ch/ ). Molecular docking shows the binding of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. (I) The lowest binding (LB) affinity of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. ns, not significant. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). AR, androgen receptor.

Techniques Used: Inhibition, CCK-8 Assay, Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics



Similar Products

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti cdc20
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Cdc20, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti cdc20/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti cdc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech cdc20
( A ) Protein levels of the MCC were assessed by immunoblots in control and USP8-depleted oocytes. The blots were probed with USP8, BUBR1, <t>CDC20,</t> BUB3, MAD2, and Cofilin antibodies. ( B ) Localization of BUB3 at the prometaphase I stage in control, USP8-KD, and USP8-rescue oocytes. At 3 hours after GVBD, oocytes were fixed and immunostained for BUB3, CREST, and DNA (Hoechst). Scale bar, 10 μm. ( C ) The relative fluorescence intensities of BUB3 to CREST were measured in control ( n = 200, kinetochores), USP8-KD ( n = 200, kinetochores), and USP8-rescue ( n = 200, kinetochores) oocytes. The signal intensity of BUB3 was normalized with that of CREST. ( D ) Protein levels of BUB3 were assessed by immunoblots in control, USP8-KD, and USP8-rescue oocytes. ( E ) Co-IP result showing the USP8 interaction with BUB3 in oocytes. Mouse oocytes were microinjected with USP8-Flag and BUB3-HA cRNA together or USP8-Flag cRNA alone, maintained for a further 4 hours in 200 μM IBMX to allow time for translation. Target proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag beads and subjected to Western blotting with Flag and HA antibodies. Input oocyte lysates were immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody to determine the expression of BUB3. ( F ) Co-IP result showing the BUB3 interaction with USP8 in oocytes. Mouse oocytes were microinjected with BUB3-HA and USP8-Flag cRNA together or BUB3-HA cRNA alone, maintained for a further 4 hours in 200 μM IBMX to allow time for translation. Target proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-HA beads and subjected to Western blotting with HA and Flag antibodies. Input oocyte lysates were immunoblotted with anti-Flag antibody to determine the expression of USP8. Data were presented as the mean percentage (means ± SEM) of at least three independent experiments. *** P < 0.001.
Cdc20, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdc20/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti cdc20 antibody
Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative <t>CDC20</t> mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance
Anti Cdc20 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cdc20 antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cdc20 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech mouse tumors
Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative <t>CDC20</t> mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance
Mouse Tumors, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse tumors/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse tumors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti cdc20
Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative <t>CDC20</t> mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance
Anti Cdc20, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cdc20/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cdc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech 10252 1 ap
Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative <t>CDC20</t> mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance
10252 1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/10252 1 ap/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
10252 1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Addgene inc cdc20
Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to <t>CDC20</t> (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).
Cdc20, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdc20/product/Addgene inc
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology cdc20
Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to <t>CDC20</t> (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).
Cdc20, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdc20/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Protein levels of the MCC were assessed by immunoblots in control and USP8-depleted oocytes. The blots were probed with USP8, BUBR1, CDC20, BUB3, MAD2, and Cofilin antibodies. ( B ) Localization of BUB3 at the prometaphase I stage in control, USP8-KD, and USP8-rescue oocytes. At 3 hours after GVBD, oocytes were fixed and immunostained for BUB3, CREST, and DNA (Hoechst). Scale bar, 10 μm. ( C ) The relative fluorescence intensities of BUB3 to CREST were measured in control ( n = 200, kinetochores), USP8-KD ( n = 200, kinetochores), and USP8-rescue ( n = 200, kinetochores) oocytes. The signal intensity of BUB3 was normalized with that of CREST. ( D ) Protein levels of BUB3 were assessed by immunoblots in control, USP8-KD, and USP8-rescue oocytes. ( E ) Co-IP result showing the USP8 interaction with BUB3 in oocytes. Mouse oocytes were microinjected with USP8-Flag and BUB3-HA cRNA together or USP8-Flag cRNA alone, maintained for a further 4 hours in 200 μM IBMX to allow time for translation. Target proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag beads and subjected to Western blotting with Flag and HA antibodies. Input oocyte lysates were immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody to determine the expression of BUB3. ( F ) Co-IP result showing the BUB3 interaction with USP8 in oocytes. Mouse oocytes were microinjected with BUB3-HA and USP8-Flag cRNA together or BUB3-HA cRNA alone, maintained for a further 4 hours in 200 μM IBMX to allow time for translation. Target proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-HA beads and subjected to Western blotting with HA and Flag antibodies. Input oocyte lysates were immunoblotted with anti-Flag antibody to determine the expression of USP8. Data were presented as the mean percentage (means ± SEM) of at least three independent experiments. *** P < 0.001.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Deubiquitinase USP8 regulates the spindle assembly checkpoint in oocytes

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeb2345

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Protein levels of the MCC were assessed by immunoblots in control and USP8-depleted oocytes. The blots were probed with USP8, BUBR1, CDC20, BUB3, MAD2, and Cofilin antibodies. ( B ) Localization of BUB3 at the prometaphase I stage in control, USP8-KD, and USP8-rescue oocytes. At 3 hours after GVBD, oocytes were fixed and immunostained for BUB3, CREST, and DNA (Hoechst). Scale bar, 10 μm. ( C ) The relative fluorescence intensities of BUB3 to CREST were measured in control ( n = 200, kinetochores), USP8-KD ( n = 200, kinetochores), and USP8-rescue ( n = 200, kinetochores) oocytes. The signal intensity of BUB3 was normalized with that of CREST. ( D ) Protein levels of BUB3 were assessed by immunoblots in control, USP8-KD, and USP8-rescue oocytes. ( E ) Co-IP result showing the USP8 interaction with BUB3 in oocytes. Mouse oocytes were microinjected with USP8-Flag and BUB3-HA cRNA together or USP8-Flag cRNA alone, maintained for a further 4 hours in 200 μM IBMX to allow time for translation. Target proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag beads and subjected to Western blotting with Flag and HA antibodies. Input oocyte lysates were immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody to determine the expression of BUB3. ( F ) Co-IP result showing the BUB3 interaction with USP8 in oocytes. Mouse oocytes were microinjected with BUB3-HA and USP8-Flag cRNA together or BUB3-HA cRNA alone, maintained for a further 4 hours in 200 μM IBMX to allow time for translation. Target proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-HA beads and subjected to Western blotting with HA and Flag antibodies. Input oocyte lysates were immunoblotted with anti-Flag antibody to determine the expression of USP8. Data were presented as the mean percentage (means ± SEM) of at least three independent experiments. *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The blots were further blocked in TBST containing 5% low-fat dry milk for 1 hour at room temperature and then incubated with USP8 (1:500; Abclonal, A7031), USP8 (1:500; Proteintech, 67321-1-Ig), Cyclin B1 (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, 4135), BUB3 (1:1000; Abcam, ab133699), BUBR1 (1:1000; Abcam, Ab28193), MAD2 (1:1000; Proteintech, 10337-1-AP), CDC20 (1:500; Proteintech, 10252-1-AP), BUB1 (1:1000; Abcam, Ab195268 ), MPS1 (1:500; Proteintech, 10381-1-AP), Flag (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich, F3165), HA (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich, H9658), MYC (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, 2278), Normal Rabbit IgG (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, 2729), or Cofilin (1:5000; Proteintech, 66057-1-Ig) antibodies at 4°C overnight.

Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Fluorescence, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Expressing

Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative CDC20 mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative CDC20 mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Article Snippet: WB analysis was conducted using anti-CDC20 antibody (1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), with β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China) as a loading control.

Techniques: Migration, Expressing, CCK-8 Assay, Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Inverted Microscopy

CDC20 knockdown suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in Z138 cells. ( A ) Relative expression of CDC20 mRNA and CDC20 protein in Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells. ( B ) Cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 assay at 0, 24, and 48 h, and presented as OD450 values. ( C ) Apoptosis was measured after culture for 48 h based on 7-AAD/PE staining. Total apoptosis meant combined early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) populations. WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins was performed in parallel. ( D ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after culture for 48 h. ( E ) Migration and invasion abilities were evaluated by Transwell assay after culture for 48 h. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. WB analysis of migration/invasion-related proteins was conducted. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDC20 knockdown suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in Z138 cells. ( A ) Relative expression of CDC20 mRNA and CDC20 protein in Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells. ( B ) Cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 assay at 0, 24, and 48 h, and presented as OD450 values. ( C ) Apoptosis was measured after culture for 48 h based on 7-AAD/PE staining. Total apoptosis meant combined early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) populations. WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins was performed in parallel. ( D ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after culture for 48 h. ( E ) Migration and invasion abilities were evaluated by Transwell assay after culture for 48 h. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. WB analysis of migration/invasion-related proteins was conducted. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Article Snippet: WB analysis was conducted using anti-CDC20 antibody (1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), with β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China) as a loading control.

Techniques: Knockdown, Migration, Expressing, CCK-8 Assay, Staining, Transwell Assay, Inverted Microscopy

Apcin demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and safety in the Z138 xenograft model. ( A ) Tumor growth curves of the control group and the apcin group. ( B ) Comparison of tumor weight between the two groups. ( C ) Comparison of spleen weight between the two groups. ( D and E ) Representative photographs of harvested tumors ( D ) and spleens ( E ) from both groups. ( F ) Body weight monitoring of mice in the control group and the apcin group. ( G ) Representative HE images (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm) of heart, liver, and kidney tissues of mice in both groups. ( H ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood biochemistry of mice between the two groups. ( I ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood routine of mice between the two groups. ( J ) Representative IHC images of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 staining of tumor tissues in the control group and the apcin group (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm). ( K ) Quantification analysis of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 expression in the control group and the apcin group calculated by MOD values. ( L ) WB validation of CDC20 and cleaved PARP expression in both groups. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Apcin demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and safety in the Z138 xenograft model. ( A ) Tumor growth curves of the control group and the apcin group. ( B ) Comparison of tumor weight between the two groups. ( C ) Comparison of spleen weight between the two groups. ( D and E ) Representative photographs of harvested tumors ( D ) and spleens ( E ) from both groups. ( F ) Body weight monitoring of mice in the control group and the apcin group. ( G ) Representative HE images (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm) of heart, liver, and kidney tissues of mice in both groups. ( H ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood biochemistry of mice between the two groups. ( I ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood routine of mice between the two groups. ( J ) Representative IHC images of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 staining of tumor tissues in the control group and the apcin group (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm). ( K ) Quantification analysis of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 expression in the control group and the apcin group calculated by MOD values. ( L ) WB validation of CDC20 and cleaved PARP expression in both groups. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Article Snippet: WB analysis was conducted using anti-CDC20 antibody (1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), with β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China) as a loading control.

Techniques: Control, Comparison, Staining, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery

CDC20 inhibition modulated PI3K/AKT pathway phosphorylation. ( A ) RNA-seq analysis of Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells revealed that differential genes were enriched in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. ( B ) Both apcin and CDC20-knockdown treatment resulted in a significant reduction of p-PI3K and p-AKT protein expression. *** P < 0.001

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDC20 inhibition modulated PI3K/AKT pathway phosphorylation. ( A ) RNA-seq analysis of Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells revealed that differential genes were enriched in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. ( B ) Both apcin and CDC20-knockdown treatment resulted in a significant reduction of p-PI3K and p-AKT protein expression. *** P < 0.001

Article Snippet: WB analysis was conducted using anti-CDC20 antibody (1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), with β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China) as a loading control.

Techniques: Inhibition, Phospho-proteomics, RNA Sequencing, Knockdown, Expressing

Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative CDC20 mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Apcin could inhibit MCL cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. ( A ) Relative CDC20 mRNA expression after 24 h apcin treatment and relative CDC20 protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment in Z138, Mino and Rec1. ( B ) MCL cell lines Z138, Mino and Rec1 were exposed to apcin (50, 100, 200 µM) for 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed using CCK-8 assay and calculated as (OD450 of treatment group/OD450 of control group) × 100%. The IC50 values of apcin at 72 h in Z138, Mino, and Rec1 was calculated by GraphPad Prism. ( C ) Z138, Mino and Rec1 treated with 50 µM or 100 µM apcin for 48 h were analyzed for proliferation using EdU incorporation assay via flow cytometry. ( D ) Cell apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 48 h apcin treatment. Total apoptosis rate represented the sum of early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) rate. Compared with their respective control groups, the total apoptosis rate increased by 21.47% (50 µM) and 51.98% (100 µM) in Z138; by 8.78% (50 µM) and 22.91% (100 µM) in Mino; and by 6.65% (50 µM) and 45.04% (100 µM) in Rec1. ( E ) MMP was evaluated using JC-1 probe in Z138 and Mino cells following 48 h apcin treatment. Results are expressed as red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. ( F ) WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. ( G ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after 48 h apcin exposure. ( H and I ) Transwell migration ( H ) and invasion ( I ) assays were conducted following 48 h apcin treatment. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. ( J ) WB assessed migration/invasion-related protein expression after 24 h and 48 h apcin treatment. All data were presented as mean ± SD from ≥ 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CDC20(1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-p53 (1:200, sc-126, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-caspase-3 (1:1000, #14220, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000, #9664, CST, USA), anti-caspase-9 (1:1000, #9502, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-9 (1:1000, A5074, Bimake, USA), anti-PARP (1:1000, #9532, CST, USA), anti-cleaved PARP (1:1000, #5625, CST, USA; 1:1000, #94885, CST, USA), anti-MMP2 (1:1000, 10373-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-MMP9 (1:1000, 10375-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-PI3K (1:1000, A5218, Bimake, USA), anti-p-PI3K (1:1000, #4228, CST, USA), anti-AKT (1:1000, A5031, Bimake, USA), anti-p-AKT (1:1000, A5030, Bimake, USA), anti-β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China).

Techniques: Migration, Expressing, CCK-8 Assay, Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Inverted Microscopy

CDC20 knockdown suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in Z138 cells. ( A ) Relative expression of CDC20 mRNA and CDC20 protein in Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells. ( B ) Cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 assay at 0, 24, and 48 h, and presented as OD450 values. ( C ) Apoptosis was measured after culture for 48 h based on 7-AAD/PE staining. Total apoptosis meant combined early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) populations. WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins was performed in parallel. ( D ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after culture for 48 h. ( E ) Migration and invasion abilities were evaluated by Transwell assay after culture for 48 h. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. WB analysis of migration/invasion-related proteins was conducted. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDC20 knockdown suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in Z138 cells. ( A ) Relative expression of CDC20 mRNA and CDC20 protein in Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells. ( B ) Cell viability was assessed by CCK-8 assay at 0, 24, and 48 h, and presented as OD450 values. ( C ) Apoptosis was measured after culture for 48 h based on 7-AAD/PE staining. Total apoptosis meant combined early (lower right quadrant) and late apoptosis (upper right quadrant) populations. WB analysis of apoptosis-related proteins was performed in parallel. ( D ) Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by PI staining after culture for 48 h. ( E ) Migration and invasion abilities were evaluated by Transwell assay after culture for 48 h. Images were captured using inverted microscopy. WB analysis of migration/invasion-related proteins was conducted. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CDC20(1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-p53 (1:200, sc-126, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-caspase-3 (1:1000, #14220, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000, #9664, CST, USA), anti-caspase-9 (1:1000, #9502, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-9 (1:1000, A5074, Bimake, USA), anti-PARP (1:1000, #9532, CST, USA), anti-cleaved PARP (1:1000, #5625, CST, USA; 1:1000, #94885, CST, USA), anti-MMP2 (1:1000, 10373-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-MMP9 (1:1000, 10375-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-PI3K (1:1000, A5218, Bimake, USA), anti-p-PI3K (1:1000, #4228, CST, USA), anti-AKT (1:1000, A5031, Bimake, USA), anti-p-AKT (1:1000, A5030, Bimake, USA), anti-β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China).

Techniques: Knockdown, Migration, Expressing, CCK-8 Assay, Staining, Transwell Assay, Inverted Microscopy

Apcin demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and safety in the Z138 xenograft model. ( A ) Tumor growth curves of the control group and the apcin group. ( B ) Comparison of tumor weight between the two groups. ( C ) Comparison of spleen weight between the two groups. ( D and E ) Representative photographs of harvested tumors ( D ) and spleens ( E ) from both groups. ( F ) Body weight monitoring of mice in the control group and the apcin group. ( G ) Representative HE images (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm) of heart, liver, and kidney tissues of mice in both groups. ( H ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood biochemistry of mice between the two groups. ( I ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood routine of mice between the two groups. ( J ) Representative IHC images of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 staining of tumor tissues in the control group and the apcin group (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm). ( K ) Quantification analysis of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 expression in the control group and the apcin group calculated by MOD values. ( L ) WB validation of CDC20 and cleaved PARP expression in both groups. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Apcin demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and safety in the Z138 xenograft model. ( A ) Tumor growth curves of the control group and the apcin group. ( B ) Comparison of tumor weight between the two groups. ( C ) Comparison of spleen weight between the two groups. ( D and E ) Representative photographs of harvested tumors ( D ) and spleens ( E ) from both groups. ( F ) Body weight monitoring of mice in the control group and the apcin group. ( G ) Representative HE images (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm) of heart, liver, and kidney tissues of mice in both groups. ( H ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood biochemistry of mice between the two groups. ( I ) Comparison of relevant parameters in blood routine of mice between the two groups. ( J ) Representative IHC images of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 staining of tumor tissues in the control group and the apcin group (×200 magnification; scale bar, 100 μm). ( K ) Quantification analysis of CDC20, cleaved PARP and Ki67 expression in the control group and the apcin group calculated by MOD values. ( L ) WB validation of CDC20 and cleaved PARP expression in both groups. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ns meant no significance

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CDC20(1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-p53 (1:200, sc-126, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-caspase-3 (1:1000, #14220, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000, #9664, CST, USA), anti-caspase-9 (1:1000, #9502, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-9 (1:1000, A5074, Bimake, USA), anti-PARP (1:1000, #9532, CST, USA), anti-cleaved PARP (1:1000, #5625, CST, USA; 1:1000, #94885, CST, USA), anti-MMP2 (1:1000, 10373-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-MMP9 (1:1000, 10375-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-PI3K (1:1000, A5218, Bimake, USA), anti-p-PI3K (1:1000, #4228, CST, USA), anti-AKT (1:1000, A5031, Bimake, USA), anti-p-AKT (1:1000, A5030, Bimake, USA), anti-β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China).

Techniques: Control, Comparison, Staining, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery

CDC20 inhibition modulated PI3K/AKT pathway phosphorylation. ( A ) RNA-seq analysis of Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells revealed that differential genes were enriched in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. ( B ) Both apcin and CDC20-knockdown treatment resulted in a significant reduction of p-PI3K and p-AKT protein expression. *** P < 0.001

Journal: Annals of Hematology

Article Title: Inhibition of CDC20 suppresses the development and progression of mantle cell lymphoma through PI3K/AKT pathway

doi: 10.1007/s00277-026-06926-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDC20 inhibition modulated PI3K/AKT pathway phosphorylation. ( A ) RNA-seq analysis of Z138-shNC cells and Z138-shCDC20 cells revealed that differential genes were enriched in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. ( B ) Both apcin and CDC20-knockdown treatment resulted in a significant reduction of p-PI3K and p-AKT protein expression. *** P < 0.001

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CDC20(1:1000, sc-13162, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-p53 (1:200, sc-126, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-caspase-3 (1:1000, #14220, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000, #9664, CST, USA), anti-caspase-9 (1:1000, #9502, CST, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-9 (1:1000, A5074, Bimake, USA), anti-PARP (1:1000, #9532, CST, USA), anti-cleaved PARP (1:1000, #5625, CST, USA; 1:1000, #94885, CST, USA), anti-MMP2 (1:1000, 10373-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-MMP9 (1:1000, 10375-2-AP, Proteintech, China), anti-PI3K (1:1000, A5218, Bimake, USA), anti-p-PI3K (1:1000, #4228, CST, USA), anti-AKT (1:1000, A5031, Bimake, USA), anti-p-AKT (1:1000, A5030, Bimake, USA), anti-β-actin (1:15000, 66009-1-Ig, Proteintech, China).

Techniques: Inhibition, Phospho-proteomics, RNA Sequencing, Knockdown, Expressing

Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced CDRs correlated with prostate cancer prognosis. (A) Visualization of core genes' dependency in different prostate cancer cells with CRISPR-Cas9 and siRNA screening. (B, C) Survival analysis of CDRs in different CRPC patient cohorts. (D) The relative expression of CDRs in normal prostate tissues and prostate cancer tissues in the TCGA-PRAD cohort. Gleason score and tumor stage correlation analysis of CDRs in different prostate cancer patient cohorts. All prostate patient cohorts were indicated in the corresponding panels. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).

Article Snippet: Three guide RNAs (gRNA) for each target, including RB1, E2F1, CDC20, RRM2, and DTL, were designed, generated, and cloned into CRSIPR-Cas13 corresponding gRNA backbone (Addgene, 109053).

Techniques: CRISPR, Expressing, Ubiquitin Proteomics

CDRs linked with neuroendocrine features in prostate cancer cohorts. (A) The Venn diagram illustrates the genes specifically enhanced in prostate cancer compared with normal prostate tissues and NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma. (B, C) The relative expression of CDRs in NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma in different prostate cancer cohorts. (D) Correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score. The red indicates the higher NE score. (E, F) Pearson correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score CRPC cohort. (G) The heatmap indicates the relative expression of CDRs and AR, as well as KLK3, a transcription activity indication of AR. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NEPC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer; NE, neuroendocrine; AR, androgen receptor; KLK3, kallikrein-related peptidase 3.

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDRs linked with neuroendocrine features in prostate cancer cohorts. (A) The Venn diagram illustrates the genes specifically enhanced in prostate cancer compared with normal prostate tissues and NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma. (B, C) The relative expression of CDRs in NEPC compared with adenocarcinoma in different prostate cancer cohorts. (D) Correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score. The red indicates the higher NE score. (E, F) Pearson correlation analysis of CDRs with NE score CRPC cohort. (G) The heatmap indicates the relative expression of CDRs and AR, as well as KLK3, a transcription activity indication of AR. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NEPC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer; NE, neuroendocrine; AR, androgen receptor; KLK3, kallikrein-related peptidase 3.

Article Snippet: Three guide RNAs (gRNA) for each target, including RB1, E2F1, CDC20, RRM2, and DTL, were designed, generated, and cloned into CRSIPR-Cas13 corresponding gRNA backbone (Addgene, 109053).

Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics

CDRs ablation suppressed prostate cancer cell proliferation. (A) The circuit diagram illustrates the correlation among CDRs co-expressed gene sets. (B) Venn analysis of the overlap of CDRs co-expressed genes. (C) The heatmap shows the relative expression of CDRs overlapped co-expressed genes in patients with NE signature high and low groups. (D – F) The heatmap illustrates the correlation of CDRs co-expressed genes with CDRs in ADPC (D) and CRPC (E, F) patient cohorts. (G, H) KEGG pathway analysis (G) and GSEA analysis (H) of enriched biological processes of CDRs and CDRs co-expressed genes. (I, J) The diagram illustrates the working model of CRISPR-Cas13 for RNA silencing and knockdown efficiency of CDRs with the corresponding gRNAs. (K, L) Cell growth assays indicate the impact of CDRs knockdown on the viability of different prostate cancer cells. (M) Western blotting analysis of the expression of cell cycle-regulated genes, including CCND1, CDK1, and p-CDK1, after CDRs knockdown. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NE, neuroendocrine; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; CCND1, cyclin D1; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDRs ablation suppressed prostate cancer cell proliferation. (A) The circuit diagram illustrates the correlation among CDRs co-expressed gene sets. (B) Venn analysis of the overlap of CDRs co-expressed genes. (C) The heatmap shows the relative expression of CDRs overlapped co-expressed genes in patients with NE signature high and low groups. (D – F) The heatmap illustrates the correlation of CDRs co-expressed genes with CDRs in ADPC (D) and CRPC (E, F) patient cohorts. (G, H) KEGG pathway analysis (G) and GSEA analysis (H) of enriched biological processes of CDRs and CDRs co-expressed genes. (I, J) The diagram illustrates the working model of CRISPR-Cas13 for RNA silencing and knockdown efficiency of CDRs with the corresponding gRNAs. (K, L) Cell growth assays indicate the impact of CDRs knockdown on the viability of different prostate cancer cells. (M) Western blotting analysis of the expression of cell cycle-regulated genes, including CCND1, CDK1, and p-CDK1, after CDRs knockdown. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). NE, neuroendocrine; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; CCND1, cyclin D1; CDK1, cyclin-dependent kinase 1.

Article Snippet: Three guide RNAs (gRNA) for each target, including RB1, E2F1, CDC20, RRM2, and DTL, were designed, generated, and cloned into CRSIPR-Cas13 corresponding gRNA backbone (Addgene, 109053).

Techniques: Expressing, CRISPR, Knockdown, Western Blot, Ubiquitin Proteomics

CDRs were transcriptionally regulated by the RB1/E2F1 axis in prostate cancer. (A) The diagrams show the canonical E2F1 motif location within the promoter of CDRs. (B) ChIP-sequencing E2F1 enrichment peak within the promoter of CDRs. (C) The relative enrichment of E2F1 within the promoter of CDRs was determined using standard ChIP-qPCR. (D) ChIP-sequencing peaks show the relative enrichment of E2F1 in CDRs' promoters after RB1 is known. (E – G) The relative expression of CDRs in CRPC patients with different RB1 deletion status. (H) CDRs expression in patients with RB1 deletion mutations from different prostate cancer cohorts. (I) qRT-PCR detected the relative expression of CDRs after RB1 or E2F1 knockdown with CRISPR-Cas13. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). RB1, retinoblastoma tumor suppressor 1; E2F1, early 2 factor 1; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Figure Lengend Snippet: CDRs were transcriptionally regulated by the RB1/E2F1 axis in prostate cancer. (A) The diagrams show the canonical E2F1 motif location within the promoter of CDRs. (B) ChIP-sequencing E2F1 enrichment peak within the promoter of CDRs. (C) The relative enrichment of E2F1 within the promoter of CDRs was determined using standard ChIP-qPCR. (D) ChIP-sequencing peaks show the relative enrichment of E2F1 in CDRs' promoters after RB1 is known. (E – G) The relative expression of CDRs in CRPC patients with different RB1 deletion status. (H) CDRs expression in patients with RB1 deletion mutations from different prostate cancer cohorts. (I) qRT-PCR detected the relative expression of CDRs after RB1 or E2F1 knockdown with CRISPR-Cas13. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). RB1, retinoblastoma tumor suppressor 1; E2F1, early 2 factor 1; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

Article Snippet: Three guide RNAs (gRNA) for each target, including RB1, E2F1, CDC20, RRM2, and DTL, were designed, generated, and cloned into CRSIPR-Cas13 corresponding gRNA backbone (Addgene, 109053).

Techniques: ChIP-sequencing, ChIP-qPCR, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Knockdown, CRISPR, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Virtual screening identified compounds that suppressed advanced prostate cancer. (A) The diagram illustrates structure-based virtual screening strategies for CDRs-targeted compounds. (B) The heatmap shows the binding affinity of compounds with CDRs. The red indicated a higher binding affinity of compounds with the corresponding compounds. (C, D) Cell viability assays were used to determine the tumor suppressive effect of compounds with high CDRs-binding affinity in different prostate cancer cell models. (E – G) The 2D structure of Q199, XDD60, and A79, which exhibits the most significant anti-tumor efficacy in prostate cancer cell models. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Figure Lengend Snippet: Virtual screening identified compounds that suppressed advanced prostate cancer. (A) The diagram illustrates structure-based virtual screening strategies for CDRs-targeted compounds. (B) The heatmap shows the binding affinity of compounds with CDRs. The red indicated a higher binding affinity of compounds with the corresponding compounds. (C, D) Cell viability assays were used to determine the tumor suppressive effect of compounds with high CDRs-binding affinity in different prostate cancer cell models. (E – G) The 2D structure of Q199, XDD60, and A79, which exhibits the most significant anti-tumor efficacy in prostate cancer cell models. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2).

Article Snippet: Three guide RNAs (gRNA) for each target, including RB1, E2F1, CDC20, RRM2, and DTL, were designed, generated, and cloned into CRSIPR-Cas13 corresponding gRNA backbone (Addgene, 109053).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics

Compounds targeting CDRs exhibited superior anti-tumor efficacy compared with AR antagonists. (A – E) The tumor cell growth inhibition effects of different dosages of Q199, XDD60, and A79, as well as enzalutamide, were determined with CCK-8 assays (A–D), and the IC 50 of each agent was calculated with three independent experiments (E). (F, G) The histograms show the relative cell viability after being treated with 5 M of Q199, XDD60, or A79 alone, or a combination. (H) The Venn diagram shows the overlap of Q199, XDD60, and A79 potential targets predicted with SwissTargetPrediction ( http://swisstargetprediction.ch/ ). Molecular docking shows the binding of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. (I) The lowest binding (LB) affinity of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. ns, not significant. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). AR, androgen receptor.

Journal: Genes & Diseases

Article Title: Integrative high-throughput studies to develop novel targets and drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101732

Figure Lengend Snippet: Compounds targeting CDRs exhibited superior anti-tumor efficacy compared with AR antagonists. (A – E) The tumor cell growth inhibition effects of different dosages of Q199, XDD60, and A79, as well as enzalutamide, were determined with CCK-8 assays (A–D), and the IC 50 of each agent was calculated with three independent experiments (E). (F, G) The histograms show the relative cell viability after being treated with 5 M of Q199, XDD60, or A79 alone, or a combination. (H) The Venn diagram shows the overlap of Q199, XDD60, and A79 potential targets predicted with SwissTargetPrediction ( http://swisstargetprediction.ch/ ). Molecular docking shows the binding of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. (I) The lowest binding (LB) affinity of CDRs with Q199, XDD60, and A79. ns, not significant. ∗∗ p < 0.01. CDRs refers to CDC20 (cell division cycle 20), DTL (denticleless E3 ubiquitin protein ligase), and RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2). AR, androgen receptor.

Article Snippet: Three guide RNAs (gRNA) for each target, including RB1, E2F1, CDC20, RRM2, and DTL, were designed, generated, and cloned into CRSIPR-Cas13 corresponding gRNA backbone (Addgene, 109053).

Techniques: Inhibition, CCK-8 Assay, Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics